A person facing leaked intimate content is vulnerable to exaggerated promises, unclear fees and requests for unnecessary personal files. A credible provider should explain its process, limits and handling of sensitive information before asking the client to proceed.
1–3. Confidentiality, data minimization and secure contact
Ask how the provider stores case information, who can access it and why each document is needed. A responsible service should not demand the original intimate video when URLs and contextual evidence are sufficient.
4–6. Source analysis, targeted action and written scope
The provider should identify the website and relevant infrastructure before promising a route. Fees, covered URLs, follow-up period and exclusions should be clear.
- A private intake channel and identifiable business contact.
- A reason for every sensitive document requested.
- A written list of URLs and scope.
- A case-specific removal strategy.
- Progress updates and retained confirmation records.
- Clear pricing and refund terms where applicable.
7–8. Realistic claims and transparent limitations
Avoid providers claiming permanent deletion from the entire internet without reviewing the case. Search delisting, source removal and re-upload monitoring are separate tasks with different limitations.
9–10. Evidence quality and aftercare
The service should preserve a clear action log, verify public status after action and explain how newly discovered copies will be handled. Monitoring should have a defined duration and scope.
A confidential, case-specific approach
GoLink reviews each case before proposing work, provides a defined scope and receives urgent reports 24/7. Clients should compare providers carefully and never share passwords, one-time codes or unnecessary private files.
GoLink Abuse Team: [email protected]
24/7 Hotline: 0963 356 926
